How do I search for planning appeals?

Claw lets you search over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate and DPEA. Use our advanced filters to narrow results by local authority, appeal type, decision outcome, date range, and more. You can also use full-text search to find specific keywords in decision letters.

What planning appeal data does Claw include?

Claw indexes appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) covering England, the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) covering Scotland, and Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) covering Wales. This includes householder appeals, full planning appeals, enforcement notices, listed building appeals, and more — with AI-generated highlights from each decision letter.

What is the success rate for planning appeals in the UK?

Nationally, around 30-35% of planning appeals are allowed or part-allowed. However, success rates vary significantly by local authority and appeal type. Claw provides detailed success rate data for every local planning authority so you can benchmark your chances before appealing.

Claw is built for planning professionals — including planning consultants, architects, developers, solicitors, and local planning authority officers. Anyone who needs to research planning appeal precedents, analyse decision trends, or prepare statements of case will benefit from Claw.

Can I read the original appeal decision letters?

Yes. Claw provides direct access to original decision letter PDFs for every appeal. You can also use our AI chat feature to ask questions about any decision letter and get instant answers — no need to read the entire document.

How much does Claw cost?

Claw offers a 14-day free trial with full access. After that, plans start from £49/month for individuals. Team plans are available for organisations that need multiple seats and shared bookmarks. No credit card is required to start your trial.

169,310 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

Trusted by planning professionals at

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

Planning Appeals

Local Authorities

Unique Appellants

Appeals Allowed

Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Quashed

Appeal Quashed — LEEDS

3376890

5A Fire Station Houses, LEEDS, LS9 6NL

The appeal decision letter concerns an enforcement notice (EN) issued by Leeds City Council against Mr. Juris Vilumsons for the alleged unauthorized erection of a dwellinghouse at 5A Fire Station Houses, Gipton. The EN required the demolition of the dwelling and the removal of debris, with compliance periods set at 9 and 10 months. The main issues revolved around the clarity and validity of the EN. The Inspector noted that the EN failed to specify how the constructed dwelling deviated from the planning permission granted in January 2023, which led to confusion regarding the alleged breach. The Council's reasoning cited visual amenity impacts and harm to neighboring properties but lacked precision in detailing how the dwelling was detrimental. Furthermore, the EN included references to boundary treatments that were not part of the alleged breach, adding to the ambiguity. The Inspector highlighted that the Council's subsequent clarifications introduced new reasons for the enforcement that were not included in the original EN, potentially causing injustice to the appellant. Additionally, the EN was deemed invalid as it was not served on the owner/occupier of the adjacent property, which could lead to legal complications. Ultimately, the Inspector quashed the EN, concluding that it did not provide sufficient clarity regarding the breach of planning control, compliance steps, or the land involved. As a result, the appeal on various grounds and the deemed application for planning permission were not considered.

Planning appeal — Mynydd ddu

CAS-04775-P8X3F1

Graig Goch Ganol, Mynydd ddu, CH74BR

The planning appeal decision letter from Conwy County Borough Council outlines the procedures for handling feedback, complaints, and challenges related to planning and environmental decisions. The main issues addressed include the appeal process, the handling of complaints, and the conditions under which decisions can be challenged. Key arguments presented in the letter emphasize the importance of clear communication and the impartial investigation of complaints. The Quality Team is responsible for addressing feedback and ensuring that all comments are considered, with a commitment to respond within 20 working days. The letter clarifies the definitions of appeal outcomes, such as "Allowed" (planning permission granted) and "Dismissed" (permission denied). The Inspector's reasoning is based on the need for objectivity in decision-making, ensuring that local opinions are weighed against planning policies and evidence. The letter also highlights the limitations of the appeal process, stating that decisions cannot be revisited unless there is a legal error. The final decision reiterates that complaints about the appeal process or decisions must be directed to the Quality Assurance Team, which will conduct an independent investigation. If a mistake is found, the team will apologize and take corrective action. The letter also outlines the process for challenging decisions in the High Court, emphasizing that challenges must be based on legal grounds rather than personal disagreement with the outcome. Overall, the letter serves as a comprehensive guide for stakeholders on how to engage with the planning appeal system, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the importance of adhering to established procedures.

Planning appeal — the UK

CAS-04938-X0W5M7

Land And Buildings Lying To The South Of Kemys Way, SA6 8QN

The appeal decision letter concerns a planning application made by Miss Ashleigh Boyce for a micro-energy storage facility on land in Swansea Enterprise Park, which was refused by the City and County of Swansea Council. The Inspector, P J Davies, dismissed the appeal on July 16, 2026, citing key issues related to the visual impact of the development and its compliance with biodiversity and ecosystem resilience policies. The Council's refusal was based on conflicts with several local development plan policies, although the Inspector noted that these policies, while material, were not determinative due to the expiration of the Swansea Local Development Plan. The main issues identified were the potential negative effects on the visual amenities of the area and the impact on local biodiversity, particularly concerning three significant trees near the proposed site. The Inspector found that the proposed development would likely harm the visual character of the area due to the impact on high-quality trees, particularly T1 and T2, whose root protection areas would be compromised. The evidence suggested that T3 would likely not survive the development, and there were insufficient plans for compensatory planting or alternative site considerations. Although the proposal aimed to provide renewable energy, the Inspector concluded that the benefits did not outweigh the potential harm to visual amenity and biodiversity. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, with the Inspector emphasizing the need for a more thorough approach to biodiversity and ecosystem resilience in line with national planning policy. No specific conditions were outlined in the decision, as the appeal was entirely dismissed.

Planning appeal — Shrewsbury

CAS-05004-R6H4Q9

17 Pool Orchard, Shrewsbury, SY5 9FG

The appeal decision concerns a planning application made by Mr. Peter Humphries for the modification of a fence and the creation of a dropped kerb to facilitate parking of a motorhome at 17 Pool Orchard, Crew Green, Shrewsbury. Powys County Council refused the application, prompting the appeal under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main issue identified by the Inspector was the impact of the proposed development on highway safety. The Inspector noted that while the development introduces an additional access point, the modifications were minimal, and the turning head would remain unchanged, preserving its function for vehicle manoeuvring. The Inspector assessed that the anticipated increase in vehicle movements would be modest and would not significantly compromise highway safety, given the low traffic levels and speeds in the area. The Inspector also addressed concerns regarding the long-term integrity of the estate layout and potential future developments, concluding that these concerns were not substantial enough to affect the decision. The appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to conditions that require adherence to the approved plans and the submission of a biodiversity enhancement scheme within three months. In conclusion, the Inspector found that the development complied with local planning policies regarding highway safety and did not conflict with broader planning principles. The decision reflects a commitment to sustainable development as outlined in the Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.

Turned Away

Appeal Turned Away — the UK

CLUD-260-2200

44 Muirhead Road, G69 7HB

On February 18, 2026, Glasgow City Council issued a decision letter regarding the application (Ref: 25/02674/ELU) for the use of an outbuilding at 44 Muirhead Road, Glasgow, as a beauty salon. The application was refused based on the determination that the proposed use would not be lawful, necessitating a formal planning application. The main issue at hand was the legality of the intended use of the outbuilding. The planning authority concluded that the evidence provided did not support the claim for lawful use, thus rejecting the application. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to planning regulations, which require proper authorization for changes in land use. The Inspector's reasoning centered on the lack of sufficient evidence to establish that the proposed beauty salon could operate lawfully under existing planning laws. Consequently, the council emphasized that a new planning application would be required to pursue this development. The final decision was a refusal of the application, with the applicant being informed of their right to appeal the decision to the Scottish Ministers within three months. The appeal process was outlined, including the requirement to submit relevant documents alongside the appeal notice. The decision notice serves as a legal document and should be retained for future reference.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — July 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

AI Assistant Connector (Claude & ChatGPT)

New

Connect Claw to Claude or ChatGPT and search planning appeals conversationally — read decisions, check citations, and pull case details right inside your assistant.

Full-Text Decision Search

New

Search now finds cases by any wording inside the decision letter itself — not just the address, metadata, or AI summary.

Highlighted Search Matches

New

Results now show the exact passage from the decision that matched your search, highlighted in context.

View all updates

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”

PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”

Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

Unlimited search queries
Full planning appeal database access
PDF document viewing
Save searches and bookmarks
Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
AI Chat with Appeals

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

Everything in Standard
AI Chat with Appeals
Ask questions about any appeal document
Get instant AI-powered insights
Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.