How do I search for planning appeals?

Claw lets you search over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate and DPEA. Use our advanced filters to narrow results by local authority, appeal type, decision outcome, date range, and more. You can also use full-text search to find specific keywords in decision letters.

What planning appeal data does Claw include?

Claw indexes appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) covering England, the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) covering Scotland, and Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) covering Wales. This includes householder appeals, full planning appeals, enforcement notices, listed building appeals, and more — with AI-generated highlights from each decision letter.

What is the success rate for planning appeals in the UK?

Nationally, around 30-35% of planning appeals are allowed or part-allowed. However, success rates vary significantly by local authority and appeal type. Claw provides detailed success rate data for every local planning authority so you can benchmark your chances before appealing.

Claw is built for planning professionals — including planning consultants, architects, developers, solicitors, and local planning authority officers. Anyone who needs to research planning appeal precedents, analyse decision trends, or prepare statements of case will benefit from Claw.

Can I read the original appeal decision letters?

Yes. Claw provides direct access to original decision letter PDFs for every appeal. You can also use our AI chat feature to ask questions about any decision letter and get instant answers — no need to read the entire document.

How much does Claw cost?

Claw offers a 14-day free trial with full access. After that, plans start from £49/month for individuals. Team plans are available for organisations that need multiple seats and shared bookmarks. No credit card is required to start your trial.

162,328 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

Trusted by planning professionals at

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

Planning Appeals

Local Authorities

Unique Appellants

Appeals Allowed

Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Planning appeal — Dunfermline

TENA-250-2003 · Added 26 Jun 2026

8 St Bridgets Brae, Dunfermline, KY11 9LT

On 25 June 2026, the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) issued a decision regarding an appeal by Mr. S. Musgrove concerning a Tree Enforcement Notice at 8 St Bridget’s Brae, Dalgety Bay. The appeal was submitted on 19 June 2026 but was deemed out of time, as it should have been filed within three months of the decision notice from Fife Council. The main issue identified was the timeliness of the appeal submission. The DPEA clarified that, according to The Town and Country Planning (Appeals) (Scotland) Regulations 2013, there is no provision for accepting appeals submitted after the specified deadline. Key arguments were not discussed in detail due to the procedural nature of the decision, focusing instead on the regulatory framework governing the appeal process. The Reporter, Morag Smith, emphasized the importance of adhering to the established timelines for appeals, indicating that the DPEA has no discretion to accept late submissions. As a result, the final decision was to reject the appeal on the grounds of being out of time. The letter advised Mr. Musgrove to consult with Fife Council regarding potential next steps. A copy of the decision was also sent to the planning authority for their records.

Turned Away

Appeal Turned Away — the UK

CLUD-260-2200 · Added 19 May 2026

44 Muirhead Road, G69 7HB

On February 18, 2026, Glasgow City Council issued a decision letter regarding the application (Ref: 25/02674/ELU) for the use of an outbuilding at 44 Muirhead Road, Glasgow, as a beauty salon. The application was refused based on the determination that the proposed use would not be lawful, necessitating a formal planning application. The main issue at hand was the legality of the intended use of the outbuilding. The planning authority concluded that the evidence provided did not support the claim for lawful use, thus rejecting the application. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to planning regulations, which require proper authorization for changes in land use. The Inspector's reasoning centered on the lack of sufficient evidence to establish that the proposed beauty salon could operate lawfully under existing planning laws. Consequently, the council emphasized that a new planning application would be required to pursue this development. The final decision was a refusal of the application, with the applicant being informed of their right to appeal the decision to the Scottish Ministers within three months. The appeal process was outlined, including the requirement to submit relevant documents alongside the appeal notice. The decision notice serves as a legal document and should be retained for future reference.

Planning appeal — Newcastle Emlyn

CAS-04571-T4Y6F0 · Added 16 Apr 2026

Plot adjacent North of the Gables, Newcastle Emlyn, SA38 9EL

The planning appeal decision letter concerns the refusal of a planning application (A250112) for the erection of a single dwelling at a site adjacent to The Gables, Newcastle Emlyn. The application was submitted by M and C Edwards and assessed by Cyngor Sir Ceredigion. The main issues identified in the decision were the proposal's compliance with local planning policies and its impact on the landscape. The Inspector highlighted that the site is classified as 'Other Locations' under the Ceredigion Local Development Plan (LDP) and does not meet the criteria for addressing an unmet affordable housing need or for a rural enterprise dwelling, as outlined in Technical Advice Note (TAN) 6. Additionally, the location was deemed unsustainable due to inadequate access to local services, which would necessitate reliance on private vehicles, conflicting with the principles of sustainable development. The Inspector also noted that the proposed development would encroach into open countryside, resulting in significant visual impact and harm to the character of the landscape, particularly within a designated Special Landscape Area. This was found to be contrary to several LDP policies, including DM17, DM18, and DM19. As a result, the application was refused on the grounds of non-compliance with local policies and adverse landscape impact. No specific conditions were attached to the refusal, as the application was not granted. The decision was communicated on June 17, 2025, and the applicants were informed of their right to appeal.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — the UK

3224659 · Added 13 Apr 2026

49a and 49b South End, CR0 1BF

The appeal decision concerns a planning application by Mr. Ahmet Yeldener for the erection of a first-floor rear extension, loft conversion with L-shaped dormer extensions, and conversion of upper floors into residential units at 49a and 49b South End, Croydon. The London Borough of Croydon refused the application, prompting the appeal under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main issues identified by the Inspector were whether the proposed development would provide an appropriate housing mix and satisfactory living conditions for future occupants. The Inspector noted that while Croydon’s Local Plan aims for a strategic target of 30% of new homes to have three or more bedrooms, there is no specific requirement for small sites like this one. The proposed development would consist of six small units, which the Inspector deemed suitable given the urban context and existing character of the area, which is primarily commercial and not conducive to family housing. Regarding living conditions, the proposed flats met the national space standards, although they fell short of the Local Plan's requirements for private amenity space. The Inspector concluded that the lack of private outdoor space would not lead to substandard accommodation due to the site's sustainable location and availability of nearby public spaces. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to conditions that included compliance with statutory requirements, use of specified materials, obscure glazing for certain windows, provision for cycle storage, and implementation of noise mitigation measures. The decision was made on 8th July 2019, following a site visit on 4th June 2019.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Birmingham

2025/06973/PA · Added 09 Apr 2026

5 Lindridge Road, Birmingham, B23 7HU

The appeal decision concerns the proposed erection of a 6-metre deep single-storey rear extension at 5 Lindridge Road, Birmingham, which was refused by Birmingham City Council. The appeal was made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, focusing on whether the proposed development would adversely affect the living conditions of neighboring properties, particularly regarding sunlight, daylight, and outlook. The Inspector noted that while the extension complied with certain permitted development criteria, it would breach the Council's '45-degree code', which is designed to protect the amenity of adjacent properties. Specifically, the extension would obstruct light and create an obtrusive outlook for the neighboring property at 3 Lindridge Road, and it would also cast shadows over the windows of both 3 and 7 Lindridge Road, reducing their sunlight and daylight. Despite the appellant's claims of having addressed neighbor objections and willingness to scale down the proposal, the Inspector emphasized that the appeal must consider the original application as submitted. The Inspector concluded that the proposed development would harm the living conditions of neighboring occupiers, conflicting with local planning policies aimed at ensuring high design quality and adequate living conditions. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the proposed extension was not granted approval.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — April 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Public REST API

New

Developers can now access Claw data programmatically via a public REST API with API key authentication, rate limiting, and a full management UI.

New PINS Appeals Coverage (APD)

New

Full coverage of new English planning appeals from the Appeal a Planning Decision service, which replaced the legacy ACP portal in December 2025.

API Playground & Documentation

New

Interactive API documentation with live endpoint testing so developers can explore and try every endpoint before integrating.

View all updates

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”

PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”

Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

Unlimited search queries
Full planning appeal database access
PDF document viewing
Save searches and bookmarks
Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
AI Chat with Appeals

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

Everything in Standard
AI Chat with Appeals
Ask questions about any appeal document
Get instant AI-powered insights
Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.