168,722 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Dismissed

Appeal DismissedZE2

ENA-360-2002

Croft 13, ZE2

The appeal decision involves an Enforcement Notice issued by Shetland Islands Council against Johan Adamson regarding the unauthorized commercial use of two agricultural buildings at Croft 13, Button, Veensgarth, for stabling horses. The appellant contended that the enforcement action was time-barred, the requirements of the notice were excessive, and the compliance period was too short. The Reporter, Paul Cackette, assessed the appeal based on the grounds presented. He noted that the appellant had not obtained the necessary planning permission for the commercial stabling use, which was confirmed by two retrospective applications that were not pursued. The Reporter concluded that the use of the buildings had not been continuous for ten years, which would have granted immunity from enforcement under the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. Key arguments included the appellant's claims of historical use dating back to 1986 and the assertion that stabling began around 2017. However, the evidence provided, including photographs and financial records, was deemed insufficient to substantiate a continuous ten-year use prior to the enforcement notice. The Reporter found inconsistencies and gaps in the evidence, particularly regarding user arrangements and the timeline of building completions. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the Enforcement Notice was upheld, requiring the cessation of the unauthorized commercial use and restoration of the buildings to their former agricultural use. The decision takes effect immediately, subject to any legal challenge in the Court of Session.

Dismissed

Appeal DismissedHelensburgh

ENA-130-2056

Hapland Coach House, Helensburgh, G84 7SR

The appeal decision by the Scottish Planning and Environmental Appeals Division concerns an enforcement notice issued by Argyll and Bute Council regarding alleged breaches of planning control at Hapland Coach House, Helensburgh. The main issues addressed include the alleged unauthorized changes to access, the formation of hardstanding, and the creation of a parking area on the property. The appellant, Dawn Anderson, contended that the works were either de minimis or constituted necessary maintenance, thus not requiring planning permission. However, the Reporter found that the alterations were substantial and resulted in a clear visual change, constituting development that required planning permission, which had not been granted. The Reporter upheld the council's position that the works breached planning control. The Reporter dismissed the appeal on several grounds: the works constituted a breach of planning control (ground c), enforcement action was valid (ground d), the steps required by the notice were necessary to remedy the breach (ground f), and the compliance period of two months was reasonable (ground g). The enforcement notice was upheld with corrections to clarify the description of the land affected and the steps required. The final decision mandates the removal of the additional hardstanding and reinstatement of the grass verge, with the corrections ensuring clarity without causing injustice to either party. The decision takes effect immediately, subject to any application to the Court of Session.

Part Allowed

Appeal Part Allowedthe UK

APP/P4605/C/25/3372003

61 Hagley Road West, B17 8AE

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by Birmingham City Council against Yasser Gulraiz for the unauthorized installation of front gates and boundary walls at 61 Hagley Road West. The main issues addressed were whether the construction constituted a breach of planning control, the appropriateness of the enforcement notice's requirements, and the compliance period. The Inspector found that the front wall and gates exceeded the permitted height of 1 meter adjacent to a highway, thus constituting a breach of planning control. The appellant argued that the development was permitted under the General Permitted Development Order; however, the Inspector concluded that the height limitation applied, and the construction did not comply with the Order. The appeal on this ground failed. Regarding the appeal on the grounds of excessive requirements (ground f), the Inspector acknowledged that while the enforcement notice required the demolition of all boundary walls and gates, it was imprecise. The requirement was varied to allow for the potential reconstruction of the front boundary in accordance with previously approved plans, while excluding the shared side walls from demolition. On the compliance period (ground g), the Inspector agreed that the original three-month period was insufficient and extended it to six months to allow for necessary adjustments. In conclusion, the enforcement notice was upheld with modifications, allowing for the possibility of reconstructing the front boundary wall and gates to comply with planning regulations within a six-month timeframe.

Dismissed

Appeal DismissedOrkney

ENA-330-2012

Land At The Site Of The Former Caldale Camp Airship Station, Orkney, KW15 1TR

The appeal decision by Sinéad Lynch, appointed by the Scottish Ministers, concerns an enforcement notice issued by Orkney Islands Council regarding a change of land use from agriculture to Class 6 (storage or distribution) at the former Caldale Camp Airship Station in St Ola, Orkney. The appeal was submitted by Karen Leask, a director of Leask Marine Ltd, on two grounds: (d) that no enforcement action could be taken due to lack of evidence of a breach, and (e) that the enforcement notice was improperly served. In addressing ground (d), the Reporter acknowledged the appellant's claim that the site had not been used for agricultural purposes since the early 1990s and had been continuously used for storage. However, the council provided photographic and satellite evidence indicating a lack of storage activity at the site during key periods. The Reporter concluded that while some storage use had occurred, it was not continuous or substantiated over the required ten-year period, thus confirming a breach of planning control. For ground (e), the appellant argued that the enforcement notice was invalid as it was served on directors rather than the company itself. The Reporter noted that although the notice was not served on Leask Marine Ltd as a separate entity, it was served on the company secretary, and no substantial prejudice was demonstrated. Therefore, the enforcement notice was upheld. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the enforcement notice dated 5 March 2026 was upheld, taking effect immediately. No site inspection was deemed necessary.

Dismissed

Appeal DismissedOrkney

ENA-330-2013

Land At The Site Of The Former Caldale Camp Airship Station, Orkney, KW15 1TR

The Scottish planning appeal decision, dated 18 August 2026, concerns an enforcement notice issued by Orkney Islands Council regarding a change of use of land at the former Caldale Camp Airship Station from agricultural to Class 6 (storage or distribution). The appeal was submitted by Oliver Bethwaite, a director of Leask Marine Ltd, who contested the enforcement notice on two grounds: that no enforcement action could be taken at the time of the notice (ground d) and that the notice was improperly served (ground e). The Reporter found that while the appellant claimed the land had not been used for agricultural purposes since the First World War and had been used for storage since the early 1990s, the evidence did not substantiate a continuous change of use over the required ten-year period. Satellite images provided by the council showed no evidence of storage activity at various intervals, leading the Reporter to conclude that the alleged breach of planning control had occurred since at least October 2023, thus falling within the enforcement action time limits. Regarding the service of the notice, the Reporter acknowledged that it was not served directly on Leask Marine Ltd but on its company secretary and directors. However, it was determined that this did not prejudice the company, as the secretary had a duty to act in the company's interest. Consequently, the appeal on both grounds failed. In conclusion, the Reporter dismissed the appeal and upheld the enforcement notice, directing that it take effect immediately, subject to any application to the Court of Session.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — July 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

AI Assistant Connector (Claude & ChatGPT)

New

Connect Claw to Claude or ChatGPT and search planning appeals conversationally — read decisions, check citations, and pull case details right inside your assistant.

Full-Text Decision Search

New

Search now finds cases by any wording inside the decision letter itself — not just the address, metadata, or AI summary.

Highlighted Search Matches

New

Results now show the exact passage from the decision that matched your search, highlighted in context.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

It's a great app!

Peter

Planning Professional

We love Claw!

Olivia

Planning Professional

Hear hear, great app!

Caroline

Planning Professional

It's a game changer!

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.