171,792 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Penkridge

26/00188/FUL

The Granary, Penkridge, ST19 5NT

The appeal decision concerns a proposal by Ms. Helena Dolisznyj for a single-storey self-build dwelling at The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, which was refused by South Staffordshire District Council. The main issues examined by the Inspector included whether the proposed development constituted inappropriate development in the Green Belt, its impact on highway safety, and its potential effects on the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation (SAC). The Inspector found that the proposal was inappropriate under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) as it did not meet the criteria for exceptions related to the replacement of buildings or development on previously developed land. The proposed dwelling would be materially larger than the existing structure and would significantly harm the openness of the Green Belt. Furthermore, the site’s location was deemed unsustainable due to inadequate access to services and public transport. Regarding the Cannock Chase SAC, the Inspector noted that the proposal lacked a completed legal agreement to secure necessary mitigation measures against potential adverse effects on the SAC’s integrity. Consequently, the Inspector could not confirm that the development would not harm the SAC. On highway safety, the Inspector expressed concerns about the visibility at the access point from Lyne Hill Lane, which could pose risks despite the limited expected traffic increase. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to the identified harms, with the Inspector concluding that the proposal did not constitute very special circumstances to outweigh the harm caused by inappropriateness and other issues. No specific conditions were detailed in the decision letter.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Petersfield

SDNP/26/01505/HOUS

Old Orchard, Petersfield, GU31 4BU

The appeal decision concerns a planning application for a side and rear extension, a detached garage, and a 1m high front boundary wall at Old Orchard, Love Lane, Petersfield, Hampshire, which was initially refused by the South Downs National Park Authority. The main issue addressed by the Inspector was the proposal's impact on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area. The Inspector noted that the existing property is a large, two-storey dwelling with a mock Georgian design, set back within a maturely landscaped plot. The proposed changes would introduce a more contemporary design, with distinct architectural features and materials, including red-brown zinc cladding and light grey brick. Despite these differences, the Inspector reasoned that the new structures would not detract from the original dwelling's character due to their subservient scale and the visual separation created by design elements. The proposal was found to harmonize with the existing streetscape, characterized by diverse building styles and mature vegetation that screens much of the development from public view. Ultimately, the Inspector concluded that the proposal would not materially harm the character of the area and would comply with relevant local policies. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to conditions, including adherence to submitted plans, tree protection measures, and wildlife considerations. The decision emphasizes the balance between innovative design and contextual sensitivity in a national park setting.

Planning appeal — the UK

WAY-505-70 (Wayleave)

Land On The South Side Of The Road Leading From Kirriemuir To Brechin

The Scottish planning appeal decision letter from the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) pertains to a wayleave application associated with land on the south side of the road leading from Kirriemuir to Brechin, referenced as LT455-114 by Angus Council. The main issue addressed in the letter is the withdrawal of the wayleave application, which is a legal right to install and maintain infrastructure on someone else's land. The correspondence indicates that the necessary application for this wayleave has been formally withdrawn by the involved parties, including representatives from Bell Ingram, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, and MFMac. The key argument presented in the letter is the confirmation of the withdrawal, which means that the DPEA will take no further action regarding this matter. The Reporter's reasoning is straightforward, as it simply acknowledges the withdrawal and clarifies that the case will not proceed any further. In conclusion, the DPEA has officially recorded the withdrawal of the wayleave application and has communicated that no further actions will be undertaken in relation to this case. The letter also offers an invitation for any queries, ensuring that all parties involved are informed and have clarity on the situation.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Leeds

25/05130/OT

Index House, Leeds, LS3 1JX

The appeal decision concerns an outline planning application by Zulfi Baig for the demolition of Index House and the construction of purpose-built student accommodation and ground-floor commercial units at 70 Burley Road, Leeds. The Leeds City Council had previously refused the application, leading to this appeal. The main issue identified by the Inspector was the impact of the proposed development on the terrace of the adjacent Five Ways Recovery Academy, particularly concerning outlook and overshadowing. The Inspector noted that the terrace serves as a crucial outdoor space for individuals recovering from substance dependency, providing essential social and therapeutic functions. The Inspector observed that while the proposed building would not significantly overshadow the terrace, it would create a pronounced sense of enclosure due to its height and proximity, fundamentally altering the open character of the space. Despite the applicant's efforts to mitigate this through stepped building elements, the Inspector concluded that these measures were insufficient. In weighing the benefits of the proposal, including the provision of student accommodation and economic activity, the Inspector ultimately found that these advantages did not outweigh the substantial harm to the Five Ways Recovery Academy's terrace. The decision emphasized the importance of maintaining amenity for community facilities. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with the Inspector concluding that the adverse effects on the Academy's outdoor amenity space significantly outweighed the proposed development's benefits. No specific conditions were outlined in the decision, as the appeal was dismissed outright.

Planning appeal — the UK

WAY-505-3 (Wayleave)

Farm And Lands Of Newhall

The letter from the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) dated 20 October 2026 addresses the withdrawal of a wayleave application concerning the farm and lands of Newhall Drumoak, as referenced by Aberdeenshire Council (Planning Authority ref: LT455-19A). The main issue at hand was the wayleave application, which is typically required for the installation of utility infrastructure on private land. However, the application has been formally withdrawn, leading to the conclusion that the DPEA will take no further action regarding this matter. Key arguments or considerations surrounding the application are not detailed in the letter, as it primarily serves to confirm the withdrawal and the cessation of DPEA's involvement. The Reporter's reasoning is implicit in the acknowledgment of the withdrawal, indicating that without an active application, there is no basis for further review or decision-making. The final decision is straightforward: the case is closed due to the withdrawal of the wayleave application. There are no conditions or stipulations outlined in the correspondence, as the matter is no longer under consideration. The letter concludes with an invitation for any queries, emphasizing the DPEA's commitment to transparency and communication.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.