170,861 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Planning appeal — the UK

PPA-230-2871

2B Northumberland Street, EH3 6LW

On 2 July 2026, the City of Edinburgh Council refused a retrospective planning application (No: 26/01156/FULSTL) for a change of use from residential to short-term let accommodation at 2B Northumberland Street, Edinburgh. The refusal was based on two main issues: the detrimental impact on local amenity and the loss of residential accommodation. The Council cited that the proposal contravened Local Development Plan Policy Hou 6, which addresses inappropriate uses in residential areas, stating that the short-term let would materially harm the living conditions of nearby residents. Additionally, it was found to be contrary to National Planning Framework 4 Policy 30(e), as the loss of the residential property was not justified and would negatively affect local amenity. The Reporter's reasoning emphasized that while the economic benefits of tourist accommodation were acknowledged, they did not outweigh the adverse effects on residential amenity or the loss of housing. The proposal was deemed unacceptable under both the Development Plan and national policies, with no material considerations found to outweigh these conclusions. The decision does not grant any necessary approvals under other statutory enactments, and the applicant has the right to request a review of the decision within three months. The Council's decision highlights the balance between economic development and the preservation of residential living conditions in urban areas.

Recovered

Appeal Recovered — Ilford

APP/W5780/C/25/3372932

Land at 2-4, Land on the South Side of High Road and, Ilford, IG3 8AA

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by the London Borough of Redbridge against Mr. Daljit Johal of Southwill Limited for alleged unauthorized construction and use of three workshop structures for car repair and spray painting at a site in Seven Kings, Ilford. The notice required the removal of the structures, cessation of vehicle repair services, and restoration of the land. The main issues identified by the Inspector were the clarity of the allegation regarding the breach of planning control and the consistency between the allegation and the requirements of the enforcement notice. The Inspector noted that the notice did not specify that the change of use was “material,” which is essential for a valid allegation. Furthermore, the requirements were inconsistent, as they included a cessation of vehicle servicing, which was not part of the original allegation. The Inspector reasoned that while corrections could be made to the notice, doing so would expand the scope of the breach and create potential injustice to the appellant. The requirement for the land to be left in a "tidy condition" was also deemed subjective and open-ended. Ultimately, the Inspector concluded that the enforcement notice lacked sufficient clarity and could not be corrected without causing injustice, leading to the decision to quash the notice. As a result, the appeal was upheld, and the enforcement notice was invalidated. The Inspector indicated that the Council could issue a new enforcement notice if desired.

Quashed

Appeal Quashed — the UK

APP/J0350/C/25/3373976

62 Faraday Road, SL2 1RU

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by Slough Borough Council against Mr. Nawaz Jan for the unauthorized erection of a self-contained building at 62 Faraday Road, Slough. The notice required the cessation of the building's use as a dwelling, removal of kitchen and shower facilities, demolition of the building, and clearance of the site. The appeal was made under grounds (a) and (f) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The Inspector identified several main issues: the development's impact on the character and appearance of the area, the living conditions for future occupants, the effects on neighboring properties, and highway safety. The Inspector found that the building's design and location were incompatible with the surrounding residential character, contributing to a cramped environment and visual discord. The internal space was deemed inadequate, failing to meet minimum living standards, and lacked sufficient outdoor amenity space. The development was also found to negatively impact the living conditions of neighbors due to increased noise and disturbance from additional activity. Furthermore, the lack of off-street parking exacerbated local parking pressures, raising concerns about highway safety. Ultimately, the Inspector dismissed the appeal, upheld the enforcement notice, and refused the deemed planning application, citing conflicts with local planning policies and the absence of material considerations to warrant a different decision. The appeal on ground (f) was also dismissed, as the requirements of the notice were deemed necessary to remedy the breach.

Not Proceeded With

Appeal Not Proceeded With — the UK

APP/A1015/C/25/3373897

Five Acres, Piccadilly Road, S41 0EH

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by Chesterfield Borough Council against Mrs. Nancy Bernard for a change of use of her property, Five Acres, from a C3 dwelling house to a party venue. The notice, issued on 10 September 2025, required cessation of operations outside the permitted C3 use within 28 days. The appeal was made under sections 174(2)(a), (b), (f), and (g) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The Inspector, John Braithwaite, allowed the appeal and quashed the enforcement notice, primarily focusing on the ground (b) argument that the alleged breach had not occurred. The Inspector noted that while the property had been advertised for short-term letting and occasionally used for parties, it had not been exclusively used as a party venue. The actual use was determined to be a mixed use of C3 dwelling house and short-term holiday let. The Inspector criticized the Council for not issuing a Planning Contravention Notice prior to enforcement, which could have clarified the property's use. He concluded that the enforcement notice was invalid due to vagueness and the failure to accurately reflect the property's use. The decision emphasized that the holding of parties, as part of residential occupation, falls within the C3 use class. In summary, the appeal was allowed, the enforcement notice was quashed, and the Inspector found that the alleged breach of planning control had not occurred.

Not Proceeded With

Appeal Not Proceeded With — West Sussex

APP/L3815/C/26/3377990

Thornham Products, West Sussex, PO10 8DD

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by Chichester District Council against Mr. Michael Connors for the unauthorized change of use of land at Thornham Products to a residential mobile home site. The notice required the cessation of this use and the removal of mobile homes and associated structures. The main issues addressed by the Inspector included the location of the development, its impact on the character of the area, flood risk, compliance with gypsy and traveller policies, and the appellant's personal circumstances. The appellant argued that the site had a mixed use, including boat storage, and contested the enforcement notice on several grounds, including the assertion that the alleged breaches had not occurred. The Inspector found that the residential mobile home use constituted a material change of use and that the appellant had not demonstrated the existence of a mixed use. The alternative scheme proposed by the appellant was deemed to be ancillary to the primary residential use and thus fell within the matters alleged in the notice. Ultimately, the Inspector allowed the appeal, quashed the enforcement notice, and granted planning permission for the residential mobile home site, subject to conditions. The decision acknowledged that while the site is located in a flood risk area, the proposed layout mitigated this risk. The Inspector concluded that the development would not significantly harm the character of the area and complied with relevant planning policies, including those pertaining to gypsy and traveller accommodation.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.