How do I search for planning appeals?

Claw lets you search over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate and DPEA. Use our advanced filters to narrow results by local authority, appeal type, decision outcome, date range, and more. You can also use full-text search to find specific keywords in decision letters.

What planning appeal data does Claw include?

Claw indexes appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) covering England, the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) covering Scotland, and Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) covering Wales. This includes householder appeals, full planning appeals, enforcement notices, listed building appeals, and more — with AI-generated highlights from each decision letter.

What is the success rate for planning appeals in the UK?

Nationally, around 30-35% of planning appeals are allowed or part-allowed. However, success rates vary significantly by local authority and appeal type. Claw provides detailed success rate data for every local planning authority so you can benchmark your chances before appealing.

Claw is built for planning professionals — including planning consultants, architects, developers, solicitors, and local planning authority officers. Anyone who needs to research planning appeal precedents, analyse decision trends, or prepare statements of case will benefit from Claw.

Can I read the original appeal decision letters?

Yes. Claw provides direct access to original decision letter PDFs for every appeal. You can also use our AI chat feature to ask questions about any decision letter and get instant answers — no need to read the entire document.

How much does Claw cost?

Claw offers a 14-day free trial with full access. After that, plans start from £49/month for individuals. Team plans are available for organisations that need multiple seats and shared bookmarks. No credit card is required to start your trial.

172,536 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

Trusted by planning professionals at

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

Planning Appeals

Local Authorities

Unique Appellants

Appeals Allowed

Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Quashed

Appeal Quashed — the UK

APP/X5210/C/25/3376280

6 Rudall Crescent, NW3 1RS

The planning appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by the London Borough of Camden against Mr. Roy Shai of MIDAS REAL ESTATE LIMITED for a material change of use of a residential property at 6 Rudall Crescent from a dwelling to temporary sleeping accommodation. The Inspector, Robert Naylor, conducted a site visit on 13 October 2026, with the decision rendered on 30 October 2026. The main issues identified were the impact on housing supply, the living conditions of existing residents, and parking and congestion. The Inspector noted that the proposed use would contravene local policies aimed at preserving housing stock and preventing the conversion of residential properties into short-stay accommodations. The appellant claimed the use was intermittent and within legal limits; however, insufficient evidence was provided to support this assertion. Regarding living conditions, concerns were raised about potential noise and disturbance from transient guests. The appellant's claims of managing guest behavior lacked substantiation, leading the Inspector to conclude that the proposal could adversely affect local residents. Additionally, the proposal's impact on parking was deemed problematic, as the area is subject to parking restrictions and the development did not provide adequate evidence to mitigate increased parking demand. Ultimately, the Inspector dismissed the appeal, upheld the enforcement notice, and refused planning permission, citing conflicts with local policies and insufficient evidence to address the identified harms.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Argyll

ENVE-003-33 (Environmental Enforcement Appeal)

Mpff Creran A, Argyll, PA38 4BA

The Scottish planning appeal decision addresses 259 appeals against notices of variation issued by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) under the Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland) Regulations 2011. The appeals contested the legality of SEPA's decisions to impose new conditions on fish farm licenses, including the operation of marine pen fish farms and requirements for monitoring sea lice and farmed fish numbers. The main issues revolved around the legality of the notices of variation and the adequacy of SEPA's responses to the appellants' concerns. The Reporters, Scott Ferrie and Robert Seaton, conducted a preliminary hearing and reviewed extensive written submissions from appellants, SEPA, and third parties, including Salmon Scotland. They determined that SEPA's approach to managing sea lice and its implications for wild salmon populations were central to the appeals. The Reporters concluded that SEPA's notices of variation were not legally sound, leading to the decision to quash them. They emphasized the need for robust regulatory frameworks to protect wild salmonids from the impacts of fish farming, particularly concerning sea lice management. The final decision allowed the appeals and quashed the notices of variation. The Reporters did not impose additional conditions at this stage, indicating a need for SEPA to reassess its regulatory framework in light of the decision and the ongoing consultations regarding fish farm management practices.

Planning appeal — Forres

WAY-507-93 (Wayleave)

Edinkillie House, Forres, IV36 2QH

The correspondence from Caitlin Colville, a Senior Solicitor at Morton Fraser MacRoberts LLP, pertains to the withdrawal of a necessary wayleave application associated with the planning authority LT37 BBNP (LT37-82) in Moray Council, Scotland. The request to withdraw the application is communicated succinctly, indicating a change in the status of the application without elaborating on specific reasons or implications. The main issue at hand is the withdrawal of the wayleave application, which typically involves rights of access or use of land for utility or infrastructure purposes. The key argument, although not detailed in the letter, suggests a strategic decision to retract the application, potentially due to changing circumstances or reconsideration of the project. The Reporter's reasoning is not explicitly outlined in the correspondence, as it is a straightforward request for withdrawal rather than a decision-making document. Consequently, there is no final decision or conditions provided in this communication, as it solely serves to inform the relevant parties of the withdrawal. In summary, the letter effectively communicates the withdrawal of the wayleave application, indicating a procedural update without delving into the underlying rationale or consequences of this decision.

Part Allowed

Appeal Part Allowed — the UK

APP/J0350/C/25/3374310

9 Dawley Ride, SL3 0QE

The appeal decision concerns an enforcement notice issued by Slough Borough Council against Mrs. Alka Patel for the unauthorized erection of a self-contained building at 9 Dawley Ride, Slough. The notice required the cessation of its use as a dwelling, removal of kitchen and shower facilities, and demolition of the building within six months. The appeal was made on grounds (a) and (f) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, with the Inspector correcting the enforcement notice to clarify that it addressed both the building's erection and its use as a dwelling. The Inspector dismissed the appeal, upholding the enforcement notice and refusing planning permission. Key issues included the development's impact on the character and appearance of the area, living conditions for occupiers, effects on neighboring residents, and highway safety. The Inspector found that the building's design and location were inconsistent with the surrounding residential character, leading to a cramped appearance and insufficient amenity space. Additionally, the building's use as a dwelling would negatively affect the privacy and living conditions of neighboring properties due to increased noise and activity. The Inspector also noted that the development would exacerbate parking pressures in an already congested area, compromising highway safety. Overall, the proposal was deemed to conflict with several policies in the Slough Local Development Framework and the National Planning Policy Framework, leading to the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Knaresborough

25/03021/LB

Plompton Hall Farmhouse, Knaresborough, HG5 8NA

The planning appeal decision concerns two applications by Stephen Isaacs for the repair and restoration of an outbuilding at Plompton Hall Farmhouse, a Grade II listed building in North Yorkshire. The appeals were made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, following refusals by North Yorkshire Council. The main issues addressed by the Inspector were whether the proposed development would preserve the listed building and its setting, and whether it would enhance the character of the Plompton Conservation Area. The Inspector acknowledged the historical significance of the Farmhouse, designed by architect John Carr, and its relationship with the outbuilding, which contributes to the overall heritage value of the site. The Inspector's reasoning highlighted that while the internal alterations and the restoration of the outbuilding would preserve its special interest, the introduction of a new glazed link between the Farmhouse and the outbuilding would result in some harm to the significance of the listed building. This connection, although designed to be subservient, would alter the perception of the historic separation between the structures. Ultimately, the Inspector allowed both appeals, granting planning permission and listed building consent, subject to specific conditions to mitigate the identified harm. These conditions include controlling the detailed design of the glazed link to ensure it remains respectful to the historical context. The decision underscores the balance between preserving heritage assets and accommodating modern needs through sensitive design.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

View all updates

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”

PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”

Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

Unlimited search queries
Full planning appeal database access
PDF document viewing
Save searches and bookmarks
Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
AI Chat with Appeals

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

Everything in Standard
AI Chat with Appeals
Ask questions about any appeal document
Get instant AI-powered insights
Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.