162,643 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Allowed

Appeal AllowedTest city

1234567

Address line 1, Test city, IG11 9PX

The appeal decision letter pertains to an enforcement notice issued by System Test Borough Council regarding a listed building and conservation area. The enforcement notice, referenced as Test 8037, was issued on May 1, 2026, with an effective date of June 4, 2026. The appellant, who has part ownership of the land, submitted the appeal on June 2, 2026, citing grounds (a) and (b) for the appeal. The main issues addressed in the appeal include the alleged breach of planning control concerning the listed building's condition and the appropriateness of the enforcement action taken by the local planning authority. The appellant contested the enforcement notice, arguing that the actions required were excessive and not justified based on the current state of the building. In the Inspector's reasoning, it was determined that the enforcement notice was valid and necessary to preserve the character and integrity of the listed building. The Inspector found that the appellant's arguments did not sufficiently demonstrate that the enforcement action was unwarranted. The Inspector emphasized the importance of maintaining the heritage value of the property within the conservation area. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the enforcement notice upheld. The Inspector may have imposed conditions related to the timeframe for compliance with the enforcement notice and any necessary remedial actions to restore the building's condition, although specific conditions were not detailed in the summary provided. The appellant also applied for an award of appeal costs, which will be considered separately.

Split Decision

Appeal Split DecisionTest city

1234567

Address line 1, Test city, IG11 9PX

The planning appeal decision letter for Appeal 6001690, submitted by Lakshmi S, concerns a householder planning application (reference 9876543) that was granted by System Test Borough Council 2 on June 1, 2026. The appeal was initiated following the council's approval, with the appellant citing significant changes in local and national planning policies as grounds for appeal. Key issues identified in the appeal include the site's location within a green belt and the presence of multiple ownerships, including agricultural tenants. The appellant argued that the local planning authority's decision did not adequately consider these factors, particularly in light of the recently adopted local plan and national policy changes. The Inspector's reasoning emphasized the need to balance development against the green belt's protective policies. The Inspector acknowledged the changes in planning policies but concluded that the development would not have a detrimental impact on the green belt's openness or character. The Inspector also noted that the site was partly owned and that the interests of other owners and tenants were appropriately addressed in the decision-making process. Ultimately, the appeal was upheld, allowing the development to proceed under specific conditions to ensure compliance with planning regulations and to mitigate any potential impacts on the surrounding area. The Inspector's decision included conditions related to site access and health and safety measures during the construction phase.

Allowed

Appeal AllowedTest city

25626release test

Address line 1, Test city, IG11 9PX

The planning appeal decision letter for Appeal 6011315, submitted by the applicant on 15 June 2026, pertains to a minor development at Lakshmi Satti, located within a green belt area. The appeal was necessitated by the local planning authority, System Test Borough Council 2, rejecting the application, which was subsequently revised in description through mutual agreement. Key issues addressed in the appeal included the appropriateness of development within the green belt, compliance with national and local planning policies, and the implications of recent changes in local planning regulations. The applicant argued that the proposed development was consistent with the objectives of the new local plan and would not adversely affect the green belt's openness or character. The Inspector's reasoning highlighted the importance of balancing development needs with the preservation of green belt land. The Inspector concluded that the proposed development would not undermine the green belt's purpose and would contribute positively to the local area. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, with conditions set to ensure adherence to environmental standards and to mitigate any potential impacts on the surrounding area. Final conditions included the submission of detailed landscaping plans and adherence to the environmental statement provided. Additionally, the applicant was granted the right to seek an award of appeal costs, reflecting the Inspector's recognition of the merits of the case presented.

Turned Away

Appeal Turned Awaythe UK

CLUD-260-2200

44 Muirhead Road, G69 7HB

On February 18, 2026, Glasgow City Council issued a decision letter regarding the application (Ref: 25/02674/ELU) for the use of an outbuilding at 44 Muirhead Road, Glasgow, as a beauty salon. The application was refused based on the determination that the proposed use would not be lawful, necessitating a formal planning application. The main issue at hand was the legality of the intended use of the outbuilding. The planning authority concluded that the evidence provided did not support the claim for lawful use, thus rejecting the application. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to planning regulations, which require proper authorization for changes in land use. The Inspector's reasoning centered on the lack of sufficient evidence to establish that the proposed beauty salon could operate lawfully under existing planning laws. Consequently, the council emphasized that a new planning application would be required to pursue this development. The final decision was a refusal of the application, with the applicant being informed of their right to appeal the decision to the Scottish Ministers within three months. The appeal process was outlined, including the requirement to submit relevant documents alongside the appeal notice. The decision notice serves as a legal document and should be retained for future reference.

Allowed

Appeal AllowedThe Salings

25/02417/FUL

Taborsfield House, The Salings, CM7 5EA

The appeal decision concerns the proposed replacement of a self-build dwelling and detached garage at Taborsfield House, Woolpits Road, The Salings, Essex, following a refusal by Braintree District Council. The main issues identified by the Inspector were the impact of the development on the character and appearance of the area, the potential effects on protected species, particularly Great Crested Newts, and whether the proposal qualifies as self-build housing. In addressing the character and appearance, the Inspector noted that the existing dwelling lacked architectural merit and that the proposed design would be more contextually sensitive. The new dwelling's positioning and landscaping would mitigate its visibility, aligning it with neighboring properties and adhering to local planning policies. The Inspector concluded that the proposal would not harm the area’s character and would comply with relevant local policies. Regarding protected species, the Inspector found that the submitted ecological assessment indicated no suitable habitat for Great Crested Newts, thus concluding no adverse impact on biodiversity. On the self-build aspect, the appellant provided a Unilateral Undertaking to ensure the dwelling would remain a self-build project, which the Inspector accepted as sufficient. The appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to several conditions, including compliance with submitted plans, a schedule for external finishes, adherence to ecological mitigation measures, and restrictions on construction hours. The decision reflects a balance of local planning policies and the specific context of the site.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — July 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

AI Assistant Connector (Claude & ChatGPT)

New

Connect Claw to Claude or ChatGPT and search planning appeals conversationally — read decisions, check citations, and pull case details right inside your assistant.

Full-Text Decision Search

New

Search now finds cases by any wording inside the decision letter itself — not just the address, metadata, or AI summary.

Highlighted Search Matches

New

Results now show the exact passage from the decision that matched your search, highlighted in context.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

It's a great app!

Peter

Planning Professional

We love Claw!

Olivia

Planning Professional

Hear hear, great app!

Caroline

Planning Professional

It's a game changer!

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.