How do I search for planning appeals?

Claw lets you search over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate and DPEA. Use our advanced filters to narrow results by local authority, appeal type, decision outcome, date range, and more. You can also use full-text search to find specific keywords in decision letters.

What planning appeal data does Claw include?

Claw indexes appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) covering England, the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) covering Scotland, and Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) covering Wales. This includes householder appeals, full planning appeals, enforcement notices, listed building appeals, and more — with AI-generated highlights from each decision letter.

What is the success rate for planning appeals in the UK?

Nationally, around 30-35% of planning appeals are allowed or part-allowed. However, success rates vary significantly by local authority and appeal type. Claw provides detailed success rate data for every local planning authority so you can benchmark your chances before appealing.

Claw is built for planning professionals — including planning consultants, architects, developers, solicitors, and local planning authority officers. Anyone who needs to research planning appeal precedents, analyse decision trends, or prepare statements of case will benefit from Claw.

Can I read the original appeal decision letters?

Yes. Claw provides direct access to original decision letter PDFs for every appeal. You can also use our AI chat feature to ask questions about any decision letter and get instant answers — no need to read the entire document.

How much does Claw cost?

Claw offers a 14-day free trial with full access. After that, plans start from £49/month for individuals. Team plans are available for organisations that need multiple seats and shared bookmarks. No credit card is required to start your trial.

163,872 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

Trusted by planning professionals at

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

Planning Appeals

Local Authorities

Unique Appellants

Appeals Allowed

Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Planning appeal — Mynydd ddu

CAS-04775-P8X3F1

Graig Goch Ganol, Mynydd ddu, CH74BR

The planning appeal decision letter from Conwy County Borough Council outlines the procedures for handling feedback, complaints, and challenges related to planning and environmental decisions. The main issues addressed include the appeal process, the handling of complaints, and the conditions under which decisions can be challenged. Key arguments presented in the letter emphasize the importance of clear communication and the impartial investigation of complaints. The Quality Team is responsible for addressing feedback and ensuring that all comments are considered, with a commitment to respond within 20 working days. The letter clarifies the definitions of appeal outcomes, such as "Allowed" (planning permission granted) and "Dismissed" (permission denied). The Inspector's reasoning is based on the need for objectivity in decision-making, ensuring that local opinions are weighed against planning policies and evidence. The letter also highlights the limitations of the appeal process, stating that decisions cannot be revisited unless there is a legal error. The final decision reiterates that complaints about the appeal process or decisions must be directed to the Quality Assurance Team, which will conduct an independent investigation. If a mistake is found, the team will apologize and take corrective action. The letter also outlines the process for challenging decisions in the High Court, emphasizing that challenges must be based on legal grounds rather than personal disagreement with the outcome. Overall, the letter serves as a comprehensive guide for stakeholders on how to engage with the planning appeal system, emphasizing transparency, accountability, and the importance of adhering to established procedures.

Planning appeal — Shrewsbury

CAS-05004-R6H4Q9

17 Pool Orchard, Shrewsbury, SY5 9FG

The appeal decision concerns a planning application made by Mr. Peter Humphries for the modification of a fence and the creation of a dropped kerb to facilitate parking of a motorhome at 17 Pool Orchard, Crew Green, Shrewsbury. Powys County Council refused the application, prompting the appeal under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main issue identified by the Inspector was the impact of the proposed development on highway safety. The Inspector noted that while the development introduces an additional access point, the modifications were minimal, and the turning head would remain unchanged, preserving its function for vehicle manoeuvring. The Inspector assessed that the anticipated increase in vehicle movements would be modest and would not significantly compromise highway safety, given the low traffic levels and speeds in the area. The Inspector also addressed concerns regarding the long-term integrity of the estate layout and potential future developments, concluding that these concerns were not substantial enough to affect the decision. The appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to conditions that require adherence to the approved plans and the submission of a biodiversity enhancement scheme within three months. In conclusion, the Inspector found that the development complied with local planning policies regarding highway safety and did not conflict with broader planning principles. The decision reflects a commitment to sustainable development as outlined in the Well-Being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015.

Turned Away

Appeal Turned Away — the UK

CLUD-260-2200

44 Muirhead Road, G69 7HB

On February 18, 2026, Glasgow City Council issued a decision letter regarding the application (Ref: 25/02674/ELU) for the use of an outbuilding at 44 Muirhead Road, Glasgow, as a beauty salon. The application was refused based on the determination that the proposed use would not be lawful, necessitating a formal planning application. The main issue at hand was the legality of the intended use of the outbuilding. The planning authority concluded that the evidence provided did not support the claim for lawful use, thus rejecting the application. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to planning regulations, which require proper authorization for changes in land use. The Inspector's reasoning centered on the lack of sufficient evidence to establish that the proposed beauty salon could operate lawfully under existing planning laws. Consequently, the council emphasized that a new planning application would be required to pursue this development. The final decision was a refusal of the application, with the applicant being informed of their right to appeal the decision to the Scottish Ministers within three months. The appeal process was outlined, including the requirement to submit relevant documents alongside the appeal notice. The decision notice serves as a legal document and should be retained for future reference.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Sheffield

25/02132/FUL

80 Brookhouse Hill, Sheffield, S10 3TB

The appeal decision concerns a planning application by Mr. Joseph Cribley for alterations to a boundary wall to install a single car driveway at 80 Brookhouse Hill, Sheffield, which was refused by Sheffield City Council. The main issues evaluated were the impact of the proposed access on highway safety and its effect on the character and appearance of the Fulwood Conservation Area. The Inspector found significant concerns regarding highway safety, noting that Brookhouse Hill is a busy route with a 30mph speed limit, and the proposed driveway would require vehicles to reverse onto the road. This maneuver would pose a risk to pedestrians, particularly given the limited visibility caused by boundary walls and landscaping. The Inspector concluded that the proposal would create an unacceptable risk to highway safety, violating Policy H14 of the Sheffield Unitary Development Plan. In terms of character and appearance, the Inspector acknowledged that while the removal of part of the stone wall would alter the property’s frontage, it would not significantly detract from the overall character of the Fulwood Conservation Area. The proposal was deemed to have a neutral effect on the area's significance and complied with relevant design guidelines. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed due to the unacceptable highway safety risks, despite the proposal's compatibility with the conservation area’s character. No specific conditions were imposed as the decision was to refuse the application outright.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — the UK

6004560

70 Westlea Avenue, WD25 9DN

The planning appeal decision letter addresses two appeals (Appeal A Ref: 6004560 and Appeal B Ref: 6004774) made by Mr. Oleksii Riabinin against Watford Borough Council's refusal to grant planning permission for developments at 70 Westlea Avenue, Watford. Appeal A involves amended internal layouts and the use of part of the first floor as an ancillary granny flat, while Appeal B pertains to the use of an existing annex for sleeping purposes. The main issue in both appeals is whether the developments have resulted in the creation of independent dwellings. The Council's concerns centered on the presence of facilities typically associated with independent living, such as kitchens and bathrooms, and the accessibility of these spaces. The Inspector reasoned that while the granny flat and annex contain such facilities, they are intended for use by relatives of the appellant, fostering significant interaction with the main dwelling. The layout of the property allows for easy movement between the different living spaces, indicating a functional relationship rather than independence. The Inspector noted that there is no subdivision of the garden, and access to shared facilities further supports this conclusion. Ultimately, both appeals were allowed, granting planning permission as the developments do not constitute independent dwellings and comply with local and national planning policies. The Inspector determined that there was no need for conditions since the developments had already been completed.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — July 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

AI Assistant Connector (Claude & ChatGPT)

New

Connect Claw to Claude or ChatGPT and search planning appeals conversationally — read decisions, check citations, and pull case details right inside your assistant.

Full-Text Decision Search

New

Search now finds cases by any wording inside the decision letter itself — not just the address, metadata, or AI summary.

Highlighted Search Matches

New

Results now show the exact passage from the decision that matched your search, highlighted in context.

View all updates

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”

PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”

Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

Unlimited search queries
Full planning appeal database access
PDF document viewing
Save searches and bookmarks
Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
AI Chat with Appeals

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

Everything in Standard
AI Chat with Appeals
Ask questions about any appeal document
Get instant AI-powered insights
Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.