172,965 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — the UK

BH2025/02112

141 Davigdor Road, BN3 1SH

The appeal decision concerns a proposal by The Baron Homes Corporation Ltd. for the conversion of a basement at 141 Davigdor Road, Hove, into three self-contained two-bedroom flats. The Brighton and Hove City Council had previously refused planning permission, prompting the appeal under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main issues identified by the Inspector were the living conditions for future occupants, particularly regarding outlook, daylight, and privacy, and the proposal's impact on the character and appearance of the area. The Inspector noted that while the flats would exceed space standards and receive adequate daylight, they would have a restricted outlook due to their single-aspect design. This limitation was deemed to cause moderate harm to living conditions, although the overall benefits of the proposal were considered substantial. In terms of character and appearance, the Inspector found that the proposed glazed balustrade, while not common in the area, would not detract from the street scene, and the loss of a hedge would have a limited impact. The absence of private outdoor amenity space was acknowledged but deemed acceptable given the site-specific circumstances. Ultimately, the Inspector concluded that the benefits of providing three family-sized homes in a location with a significant housing shortfall outweighed the identified harms. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and planning permission was granted, subject to conditions including the approval of detailed plans for the balustrade, provision of cycle parking, and achieving a minimum Energy Performance Certificate rating of ‘C’.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — the UK

261882FUL

9 Brentvale Avenue, UB1 3ER

The appeal decision concerns the conversion of a single dwelling at 9 Brentvale Avenue, Southall, into two self-contained units, which was refused by the London Borough of Ealing. The main issue identified by the Inspector was whether the proposed Flat 2 would provide satisfactory living conditions, particularly regarding space and outdoor amenity. The Inspector noted that while the total Gross Internal Area of the dwelling met acceptable standards, the kitchen and living areas fell short of the required space. Specifically, Flat 2 was found to have approximately 27.1 square meters of combined living, kitchen, and dining space, which was below the minimum standard of 29 square meters for a three-bedroom unit. Additionally, the kitchen's limited occupiable area, compounded by inadequate space for appliances, was deemed insufficient for the expected occupancy of up to five people. Regarding outdoor amenity space, the proposal did not provide adequate private outdoor space, as required by the Mayor’s Standards. The appellant suggested that nearby Brent Meadow could serve as outdoor space; however, the Inspector emphasized that private outdoor space is essential for residential units, and the proximity to public space did not meet this requirement. The Inspector dismissed the appeal, concluding that the development failed to comply with relevant policies and standards, particularly regarding living conditions and outdoor amenity space. The Inspector also noted that the potential benefits of the development did not outweigh the adverse effects, leading to the final decision to dismiss the appeal.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Birmingham

2026/01965/PA

635 Kingsbury Road, Birmingham, B24 9PP

The appeal decision concerns the proposed display of a non-illuminated static PVC banner advertisement at 635 Kingsbury Road, Birmingham, which was initially refused by Birmingham City Council. The appeal, submitted by Mr. Gabi Fisher, was assessed under Regulation 17 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2007. The main issue identified by the Inspector was the impact of the advertisement on amenity, as public safety was not contested by the Council. The site is located in a Core Employment Area, characterized by industrial and commercial premises, with residential properties situated across a dual carriageway. The Inspector noted that the area already features a variety of advertisements, contributing to an urban environment. During the site visit, the Inspector observed that while the proposed banner is large, it would be proportionate to the building's façade and would not obscure significant architectural features. The advertisement's visibility would be consistent with the existing urban context, and thus, it would not detract from the area's visual amenity. The Inspector found no conflict with Policy DM7 of the Development Management in Birmingham, which emphasizes high-quality design and compatibility with the surroundings. The appeal was allowed, granting express consent for 18 months, subject to five standard conditions outlined in the Regulations. The Inspector concluded that the advertisement would not harm amenity and recommended approval based on the evidence presented.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Hexham

26/01225/FUL

Land south of Vauce Farm, Hexham, NE47 5NA

The appeal decision concerns the proposed conversion and extension of agricultural buildings into a dwellinghouse at Vauce Farm, Langley-on-Tyne, which was refused by Northumberland County Council. The main issues identified by the Inspector were the appropriateness of the site for residential development, considering the local housing strategy, and the impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the North Pennines National Landscape (NPNL). The Inspector found that the proposal, which included a 173% increase in building volume, did not align with local policies that support residential development only through the re-use of redundant buildings that enhance their immediate setting. The extensive alterations were deemed excessive and not in keeping with the modest character of the existing structures, which contribute positively to the landscape. Additionally, the proposed development was found to harm the area's character by altering the traditional farmstead's appearance, failing to conserve or enhance the NPNL's natural beauty. The Inspector concluded that the development conflicted with several local and national planning policies aimed at protecting such landscapes. Despite acknowledging potential benefits, including biodiversity enhancements and local economic contributions, the Inspector determined that these did not outweigh the identified harms. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, with the Inspector emphasizing that the proposal did not conform to the development plan or relevant policies.

Planning appeal — the UK

GATE-100-2 (Gatecheck Review)

Aberdeen City Council

The planning appeal decision letter from the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division addresses the sufficiency of the Aberdeen City Evidence Report for the preparation of its Local Development Plan (LDP). The main issues revolved around housing and infrastructure, particularly transport, education, and healthcare, which were previously deemed insufficient. The Reporter, Claire Milne, conducted a reassessment following the submission of a revised report on September 21, 2026. Key arguments included the need for an updated Local Housing Land Requirement (LHLR) reflecting the planning authority's position, which was set at 10,560 units—significantly higher than the Minimum Housing Land Requirement (MATHLR) of 7,000 units. The planning authority justified this increase based on demographic trends, economic ambitions, and historical housing delivery data. The evidence report also highlighted challenges such as social housing needs, school capacity, and healthcare investment. The Reporter found that the revised evidence report adequately addressed previous recommendations, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the local development plan's performance and implications for the emerging plan. While a few minor issues remained, they did not indicate overall insufficiency. The final decision deemed the evidence report sufficient for the planning authority to proceed with the LDP preparation, with the expectation that ongoing assessments of housing delivery and infrastructure capacity would continue. Conditions for future work included completing a Housing Land Audit and a Brownfield Urban Capacity Study to inform the proposed plan.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.