How do I search for planning appeals?

Claw lets you search over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate and DPEA. Use our advanced filters to narrow results by local authority, appeal type, decision outcome, date range, and more. You can also use full-text search to find specific keywords in decision letters.

What planning appeal data does Claw include?

Claw indexes appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate (PINS) covering England, the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA) covering Scotland, and Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW) covering Wales. This includes householder appeals, full planning appeals, enforcement notices, listed building appeals, and more — with AI-generated highlights from each decision letter.

What is the success rate for planning appeals in the UK?

Nationally, around 30-35% of planning appeals are allowed or part-allowed. However, success rates vary significantly by local authority and appeal type. Claw provides detailed success rate data for every local planning authority so you can benchmark your chances before appealing.

Claw is built for planning professionals — including planning consultants, architects, developers, solicitors, and local planning authority officers. Anyone who needs to research planning appeal precedents, analyse decision trends, or prepare statements of case will benefit from Claw.

Can I read the original appeal decision letters?

Yes. Claw provides direct access to original decision letter PDFs for every appeal. You can also use our AI chat feature to ask questions about any decision letter and get instant answers — no need to read the entire document.

How much does Claw cost?

Claw offers a 14-day free trial with full access. After that, plans start from £49/month for individuals. Team plans are available for organisations that need multiple seats and shared bookmarks. No credit card is required to start your trial.

172,452 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

Trusted by planning professionals at

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

Planning Appeals

Local Authorities

Unique Appellants

Appeals Allowed

Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Planning appeal — Forres

WAY-507-93 (Wayleave)

Edinkillie House, Forres, IV36 2QH

The correspondence from Caitlin Colville, a Senior Solicitor at Morton Fraser MacRoberts LLP, pertains to the withdrawal of a necessary wayleave application associated with the planning authority LT37 BBNP (LT37-82) in Moray Council, Scotland. The request to withdraw the application is communicated succinctly, indicating a change in the status of the application without elaborating on specific reasons or implications. The main issue at hand is the withdrawal of the wayleave application, which typically involves rights of access or use of land for utility or infrastructure purposes. The key argument, although not detailed in the letter, suggests a strategic decision to retract the application, potentially due to changing circumstances or reconsideration of the project. The Reporter's reasoning is not explicitly outlined in the correspondence, as it is a straightforward request for withdrawal rather than a decision-making document. Consequently, there is no final decision or conditions provided in this communication, as it solely serves to inform the relevant parties of the withdrawal. In summary, the letter effectively communicates the withdrawal of the wayleave application, indicating a procedural update without delving into the underlying rationale or consequences of this decision.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Knaresborough

25/03021/LB

Plompton Hall Farmhouse, Knaresborough, HG5 8NA

The planning appeal decision concerns two applications by Stephen Isaacs for the repair and restoration of an outbuilding at Plompton Hall Farmhouse, a Grade II listed building in North Yorkshire. The appeals were made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, following refusals by North Yorkshire Council. The main issues addressed by the Inspector were whether the proposed development would preserve the listed building and its setting, and whether it would enhance the character of the Plompton Conservation Area. The Inspector acknowledged the historical significance of the Farmhouse, designed by architect John Carr, and its relationship with the outbuilding, which contributes to the overall heritage value of the site. The Inspector's reasoning highlighted that while the internal alterations and the restoration of the outbuilding would preserve its special interest, the introduction of a new glazed link between the Farmhouse and the outbuilding would result in some harm to the significance of the listed building. This connection, although designed to be subservient, would alter the perception of the historic separation between the structures. Ultimately, the Inspector allowed both appeals, granting planning permission and listed building consent, subject to specific conditions to mitigate the identified harm. These conditions include controlling the detailed design of the glazed link to ensure it remains respectful to the historical context. The decision underscores the balance between preserving heritage assets and accommodating modern needs through sensitive design.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Knaresborough

25/03020/FUL

Plompton Hall Farm House, Knaresborough, HG5 8NA

The planning appeal decision letter concerns two appeals by Stephen Isaacs against North Yorkshire Council's refusal to grant planning permission and listed building consent for the repair and restoration of an outbuilding at Plompton Hall Farmhouse, a Grade II listed building. The main issues addressed by the Inspector were whether the proposal would preserve the listed building and its setting, and whether it would enhance the character of the Plompton Conservation Area. The Inspector acknowledged that the proposal involved minimal internal alterations and the formation of a new doorway, which would not negatively impact the building's significance. However, the proposal included a new glazed link between the farmhouse and the outbuilding, which raised concerns. While the link was designed to be subservient and respectful to the existing structures, it would alter the experience of the listed building and its immediate setting, resulting in some harm to its significance. Ultimately, the Inspector allowed both appeals, granting planning permission and listed building consent, but noted that the proposal would preserve the listed building and its setting while causing some harm to its significance. Conditions were imposed to ensure careful detailing and design of the new link and other works to mitigate the identified impacts. The decision reflects a balance between preserving heritage assets and allowing for their adaptive reuse.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Pinner

PL/0336/26/PRIOR

Thrale Farm, Pinner, HA3 6SX

The appeal decision concerns a proposed barn at Thrale Farm, London, intended for hay and machinery storage. The London Borough of Harrow refused the application, leading to an appeal by Mr. Jack Russell. The Inspector's main issues revolved around whether the development qualified as permitted under the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO), specifically regarding the agricultural use of the land, the necessity of the building, the ground area covered, and excavation extent. The Inspector found that while the site is classified as agricultural land, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that it was actively used for trade or business purposes, which is a requirement under the GPDO. The appellant provided some documentation, including a letter from DEFRA and an invoice for hay sales, but these did not convincingly establish ongoing commercial activity. Additionally, the Inspector concluded that the proposed building's size was excessive relative to the agricultural needs of the unit, lacking adequate justification for its necessity. While the proposed building's footprint did not exceed the 1,500 square meters limit, the Inspector determined that the proposal did not meet the GPDO's criteria for permitted development due to the lack of evidence for agricultural use and the building's necessity. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the Inspector did not find grounds for costs against the Council, as the appellant failed to demonstrate compliance with the GPDO requirements.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — the UK

DC/25/3438/LBC

27 Sun Lane, IP12 1EG

The planning appeal decision letter addresses two appeals by Mr. and Mrs. Rapley concerning proposed works at 27 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, Suffolk, which were refused by East Suffolk Council. The appeals involve a request for listed building consent (Appeal A) and planning permission (Appeal B) for a new rear dormer and green roof to replace an existing flat roof. The main issues identified by the Inspector were whether the proposal would preserve the significance of the Grade II listed building and its setting, as well as the character of the Woodbridge Conservation Area. For Appeal B, the impact on the living conditions of neighboring occupants was also considered. The Inspector concluded that the proposed dormer would disrupt the traditional roofline of the terrace, eroding the architectural integrity of the listed building and negatively impacting the setting of adjacent listed properties. Despite the use of high-quality materials, the design was deemed incongruous and harmful to the historic character of the area. While the proposal would not significantly affect the living conditions of nearby residents, it failed to meet the requirements for preserving the historic environment. Ultimately, both appeals were dismissed. The Inspector emphasized that the limited public benefits of the proposal did not outweigh the considerable harm to the heritage assets, thus conflicting with national policies and local planning regulations aimed at protecting historic environments.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

View all updates

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”

PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”

Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

Unlimited search queries
Full planning appeal database access
PDF document viewing
Save searches and bookmarks
Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
AI Chat with Appeals

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

Everything in Standard
AI Chat with Appeals
Ask questions about any appeal document
Get instant AI-powered insights
Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.