172,146 planning appeals indexed

Find planning appeals in seconds

The UK's most comprehensive planning appeal search engine. Search, filter, and analyse appeal decisions with AI-powered insights — built for planning professionals.

No credit card required. 14-day free trial.

The UK's Most Comprehensive Planning Appeal Database

0
Planning Appeals
0+
Local Authorities
0+
Unique Appellants
0%
Appeals Allowed
0
Decision Documents

Latest appeal decisions

The most recent planning appeals, summarised by AI.

Allowed

Appeal Allowed — Goxhill

PA/2025/532

Land adjacent to Hawthorne Gardens, Goxhill, DN19 7UN

The appeal decision concerns a planning application by Keigar Homes Ltd for the erection of 15 dwellings, public open space, and community changing rooms in Goxhill, which North Lincolnshire Council had previously refused based on drainage concerns. The main issue identified by the Inspector was whether adequate surface and foul drainage could be provided without causing pollution, health risks, or flooding. The Inspector noted that the development would extend an already approved housing project and included provisions for community facilities. The refusal was primarily due to Anglian Water's objection regarding existing drainage capacity, which they indicated would not be available until 2030. However, the Lead Local Flood Authority supported the proposal with conditions, and the Inspector found that a drainage strategy could be implemented to allow construction to proceed while addressing the foul drainage issue. The Inspector concluded that the proposal would provide much-needed housing in an area lacking a five-year housing supply and would contribute positively to local amenities. The appeal was allowed, granting planning permission subject to conditions that ensure compliance with drainage strategies and other planning requirements. Conditions attached to the decision included standard time limits, adherence to approved plans, and various pre-commencement conditions related to construction management, drainage strategies, and landscaping. The Inspector emphasized that these conditions were necessary to mitigate potential impacts on the surrounding area and ensure compliance with planning policies.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Fittleworth

SDNP/26/01219/LIS

30C, Fittleworth, RH20 1ES

The planning appeal decision concerns two applications by Charlotte Williams for the property at 30C Coates Lane, Fittleworth, West Sussex, which were refused by the South Downs National Park Authority. Appeal A sought permission for a two-storey rear extension, while Appeal B sought listed building consent for the same works. Both appeals were dismissed. The main issues identified by the Inspector were whether the proposed development would preserve the Grade II listed building and its features of special architectural or historic interest, and whether it would enhance the character or appearance of the Coates Conservation Area (CA). The Inspector noted the CA's significance stems from its historic buildings and rural character, while the listed building's special interest is derived from its vernacular architecture and historic fabric. The Inspector acknowledged that the proposed extension would not detract from the CA's overall significance but raised concerns about the design's bulk and its impact on the historic form of the listed building. The extension would obscure significant architectural features and remove a characteristic chimney stack, resulting in moderate harm to the building's historic interest. Although the removal of a modern side extension was a positive aspect, it did not outweigh the harm caused by the proposed alterations. Ultimately, the Inspector concluded that the public benefits of the proposal were insufficient to outweigh the identified harm, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. The decision emphasized the importance of preserving the historic and architectural integrity of designated heritage assets in line with relevant planning policies.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — Fittleworth

SDNP/26/01228/HOUS

30C, Fittleworth, RH20 1ES

The planning appeal decision concerns two applications by Charlotte Williams regarding the property at 30C Coates Lane, Fittleworth, West Sussex. Appeal A sought permission for a two-storey rear extension, while Appeal B sought listed building consent for the same works. Both appeals were dismissed by Inspector R Hall on 23 October 2026. The main issues identified were whether the proposed development would preserve the Grade II listed building and its features of special architectural or historic interest, as well as the character and appearance of the Coates Conservation Area. The Inspector noted that the significance of the Conservation Area is derived from its historic buildings and rural character, while the listed building's special interest stems from its vernacular architecture and historic fabric. The Inspector found that, although the proposed rear extension would not detract from the Conservation Area and would remove an unsympathetic modern addition, it would introduce considerable bulk that would not appear subservient to the historic building. This would obscure important architectural features and result in moderate harm to the listed building's character. The Inspector concluded that the public benefits of the proposal, primarily private in nature, did not outweigh the harm caused. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed due to conflicts with various local and national policies aimed at protecting the historic environment and cultural heritage. The Inspector emphasized that the proposal failed to preserve the special historic interest of the listed building, leading to the final decision against the appeals.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — the UK

P/2026/0296

45 Colonial Road, TW14 8AA

The appeal decision letter concerns a retrospective planning application by Abilio Rodrigues for a roof extension at 45 Colonial Road, Feltham, which was refused by the London Borough of Hounslow. The main issue identified by the Inspector was the impact of the development on the character and appearance of both the host building and the surrounding area. The Inspector noted that the hip-to-gable conversion significantly altered the symmetry and balance of the semi-detached pair, creating an awkward visual imbalance with the adjacent property. The new gable end was deemed a prominent and discordant feature in the street scene. Additionally, the rear dormer extension, while not exceeding the ridge height, dominated the rear elevation and distorted the roof's proportions, negatively affecting the building's character. The Inspector acknowledged that while some local properties had undergone similar alterations, none were comparable in scale or design to the appeal scheme, which did not mitigate the identified harm. The development was found to conflict with local policies aimed at ensuring that extensions are subordinate and harmonize with existing structures. In conclusion, the Inspector determined that the development caused unacceptable harm to the local character and appearance, outweighing the limited benefit of additional living accommodation. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, with no material considerations warranting a different outcome.

Dismissed

Appeal Dismissed — the UK

P25/1487

Land Adj 110 Hagley Road, B63 4RL

The planning appeal decision letter concerns an application by Mr. Ashfaq Hussain for a change of use to car tyre sales at land adjacent to 110 Hagley Road, Halesowen, which was refused by Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council. The Inspector's main issues included the adequacy of living conditions for neighboring residents, the impact on the character and appearance of the area, highway safety, and biodiversity net gain. The Inspector found that the proposal would compromise living conditions by eliminating essential external amenity space for residents of a nearby residential conversion, which was intended to have access to this space. The development was deemed to harm the area's character due to the loss of soft landscaping and the incongruous design of the proposed structures, which would not blend with the predominantly residential context. Regarding highway safety, the Inspector noted inadequate visibility at the access point due to parked vehicles, insufficient on-site parking and turning space, and a lack of evidence for effective surface water management. These factors raised significant safety concerns. On biodiversity, the Inspector determined that the proposal was exempt from the statutory biodiversity net gain requirement due to its retrospective nature. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, with the Inspector attributing significant weight to the identified harms regarding living conditions, character, and highway safety, concluding that the proposal conflicted with several Local Plan policies. No specific conditions were imposed as the appeal was entirely dismissed.

Everything you need for appeal research

Stop spending hours trawling through the Planning Inspectorate website. Find the precedents you need in seconds.

Powerful Search

Full-text search with advanced filtering by decision type, local authority, date range, and more.

Comprehensive Database

Over 350,000 planning appeal decisions from the Planning Inspectorate, fully indexed and searchable.

PDF Document Access

View original appeal decision letters and documents directly in the browser.

Save & Bookmark

Bookmark appeals for later reference and build your own library of relevant decisions.

Team Collaboration

Invite team members, share bookmarks, and collaborate on appeal research together.

AI-Powered Insights

Chat with appeal documents using AI. Ask questions and get instant answers from any decision letter.

What's New — September 2026

The latest features and improvements shipped to Claw.

Cancel & Resume Your Plan

New

Cancel your subscription right from your account — you keep full access until the end of your paid term, it won’t auto-renew, and you can resume in one click if you change your mind.

Up-to-Date Appeal Decisions

Improvement

New Planning Inspectorate (England) decisions are captured and kept current automatically, with decision letters restored across recent appeals.

Smoother Appeal Viewer

Improvement

The decision viewer now closes reliably and shows a clear message when a decision letter isn’t available yet, instead of hanging.

Trusted by planning professionals

See what our users are saying about Claw.

“We've recently started using Claw, an app designed to help find appeal decisions and have been really impressed by it. It has a load of useful features with search filters that allow you to search by constraints, authorities and type of appeal to find relevant appeal decisions easily and quickly. We'd highly recommend this app!”
PlanIt Consulting

Planning Consultancy

“The Eden team is always looking for ways to efficiently clear and pragmatic planning solutions for our clients and using CLAW enables us to do this.”
Eden Planning & Development Ltd

Planning & Development Consultancy

“It's a great app!”

Peter

Planning Professional

“We love Claw!”

Olivia

Planning Professional

“Hear hear, great app!”

Caroline

Planning Professional

“It's a game changer!”

Mark

Planning Professional

Simple, transparent pricing

Start with a 14-day free trial. No credit card required.

Standard

For planning professionals

£495/yr

£41.25/mo — save £93/yr

  • Unlimited search queries
  • Full planning appeal database access
  • PDF document viewing
  • Save searches and bookmarks
  • Team collaboration (up to 5 members)
  • AI Chat with Appeals
Most Popular

Premium

For power users who need AI assistance

£595/yr

£49.58/mo — save £113/yr

  • Everything in Standard
  • AI Chat with Appeals
  • Ask questions about any appeal document
  • Get instant AI-powered insights
  • Priority support

Cancel anytime. All plans include a 14-day money-back guarantee.

Lisa Rasch, Founder of Claw

Lisa Rasch MRTPI

Founder, Claw App | Director, Freedom Planning and Design

A practicing planning consultant and the founder of CLAW — a planning appeals intelligence platform transforming how planners, consultants and local planning authorities engage with appeal data.

With a 100% success rate across her consultancy work, Lisa is trusted by homeowners, developers, architects and local authorities for her clarity, integrity and expertise. As a woman leading a fast-growing PlanTech company in a traditionally male-dominated sector, she brings together deep professional experience, commercial insight and a genuine drive to bridge the gap between policy, practice and technology.

Named one of The Planner's Women of Influence three years running.

The Planner's Women of Influence 2026

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about searching planning appeals with Claw.

Book a demo

Want to see Claw in action? Schedule a personalised demo with our team.